What is uk.legal    

A - A discussion group devoted to legal matters wherein a few lawyers give up some of  their   ......valuable time to dispense free legal advice.

What motivates these highly paid lawyers to apparently, gratuitously, help readers with their problems?

A. -  (a) A genuine desire to be helpful. IMP David Swarbrick and Ruth Hine spring to .............mind and there are others.
 
        (b) Possibly a desire to make themselves publicly known.

        (c) An appointed, or self appointed, brief to discourage complaints against the ..............judiciary and the legal profession by using ridicule, abuse and sadly, more serious ..............dishonest tactics to harass those with imaginary or genuine grievances.

I  concentrate on (c) and refer to only the tactics used by those who have, within uk.legal,
tried to discourage me in my endeavours to expose judicial corruption and conspiracy to
obstruct justice.

1......Lies.
2...... To Harassment
3.......To Abuse
4...... To Who knows of the conspiracy? 

                                                                  LIES

Liar No. 1.
MR. MARSHALL RICE:
Lawyer, who, apparently, in order to demean and harass me, published the lie that I cheated a taxi driver in the certain knowledge that a jury had found me, unanimously, 'not guilty' of that alleged offence of deception in a trial at which Judge Simpson had presided.
Mr. Rice has repeatedly declined to state his reason for publishing that libel.
Proof of the lie: Transcript of jury's verdict and the court record.

Liar No. 2.
ANTHONY R. GOLD:
Lawyer, who, apparently, in order to try to discredit me, published the two lies (a) & (b).
[Quote]
(a)  As I read the history, it was District Judge Weston who struck out your claim for failing to ......disclose a cause of action in January 1996, and it was later that year, and on appeal, that Mrs ......Justice Smith came to exactly the same conclusion.
[Unquote]

(a)  Note - proof of the lie - the official transcript of the hearing before Mrs. Justice Smith
                 discloses that she came to the conclusion that the claim plainly discloses an
                 alleged cause of action and Counsel immediately agreed.
[Quote]
(b)  The reason that I know with certainty that Mrs. Justice Smith held that your claim alleged no .......cause of action is because on 12 November 1996 she dismissed your appeal for precisely that .......very reason.
[Unquote]

(b)  Note - proof of that 2nd lie - is the judgement of Justice Smith put up in uk.legal by     .......myself and lawyers: Jon Grunewald and John (johnjo).

Liar No. 3.
NORMAN: ndryden@edin56.freeserve.co.uk  [not known whether he is a lawyer, nor known where ame from, nor his true identity, but his brief was/is clearly, to try to discredit me.]

[Quote - lie number 1.] -  [referring to the judgement of LJ Saville]
Which selectively fails to mention that LJ Saville expressly addressed the question of the
allegations, stated that they had been specifically and adequately denied by the defence,
and that this denial could be regarded as covering the individual defendants.

Proof of the lie - judgement of LJ Saville - Court of Appeal.
[Saville - Quote]
"That defence, on their behalf, specifically denies these allegations, and I can draw
absolutely no inference of the nature suggested by Mr. Hulbert from the fact that the
defendant's have not, at this stage, themselves personally denied these allegations."
[Unquote]

LJ Saville far from holding that the denials could be regarded as covering the individual
defendants, made it clear that they'd not personally denied them.

[Quote: Norman, same lie for the 2nd time]
The judge clearly ruled that the defence denials covered the defendants.
[Unquote]
Proof - even an implication is not a clear ruling.

Liar No. 4.
John: (johnjo) a lawyer who published the alleged fact that I am a vexatious litigant.

Proof of the lie = Official transcript of hearing before Justice Smith who adjourned the
hearing to allow the defendants to produce evidence in order that she could strike out
the action against Judge Simpson and Mrs. West, as being vexatious etc. and her
judgement disclosing that she did not, could not, do so.

2.  To Harrassment
3.  To Abuse
4.  To Who knows of the conspiracy?

J. Hulbert - Kingston Upon Hull