Who knows of the conspiracy?

Who knows that Mrs West took down false notes of evidence dictated by Judge Simpson
and that she  did provide transcripts of that false evidence, purportedly given by two police
officers, out of a crimonal trial?

A - Mrs. West herself, who has steadfastly refused to commit herself by certifying her
transcripts as being a true account of the evidence as she is required to in line with the
rules governing verification of transcripts and ignoring two orders of the court inviting her
to certify them as being an accurate account of the evidence.

Mr H. Shepheard: legal officer out of the Treasury Solicitor's office who served and filed
a purported defence on behalf of Judge Simpson and Mrs. West without providing a single
particular that answered the facts relied on in the statement of claim contrary to the rules
and who filed and served same same without the purported defence being approved by
Mrs. West and without any material being provided by her.

The LCD who instructed the Treasury Solicitor to act in a legal capacity for Simson and
West and who permitted the action against them to be unfairly/unlawfully struck out as
disclosing no reasonable cause of action by a District Judge.

Mrs. Justice Smith, who, after holding that the claim plainly discloses an alleged cause of
action dismissed my appeal permitting the order of the D/Judge to remain on the court record.

LJs Saville and Morritt who in the knowledge that Justice Smith had confirmed that the
claim plainly disclosed an alleged cause of action and having examined the Statement of
Claim and who held that neither Judge Simpson. nor Mrs. West , had personally denied the allegations, dismissed my application for leave to appeal to the court of appeal and permitted
the unlawful order of the D/Judge to remain on the court record.

Mr. J. Swales: Hull based Solicitor who, acting as agent for the Treasury Solicitor, for
Simpson and West, made application to the D/Judge to have the claim struck out as disclosing
no reasonable cause of action in the certain knowledge that  a cause is plainly alleged in the Statement of Claim as is damage.

Mr. Richardson: Barrister, who opposed my appeal against the District Judge's order striking
out the claim as disclosing no reasonable cause of action in the absolute knowledge that the
claim does disclose an alleged cause, as he agreed at the hearing before Justice Smith.

Apparently Mr. Marshall Rice, who belatedly published the aforementioned lie that I cheated
the taxi driver and provoked the police, which amounts to libel. That lie, I conclude, is the
only possible mitigation for trial Judge Simpson's corrupt act in tampering with police evidence
and that lie, will be known to Justice Smith and others of the judiciary that have protected him.
Mr. Rice has avoided answering my repeated question to him to state how he came by that apparent Simpson mitigation.

There are others who apparently know  that Mrs West took down false notes of evidence
dictated by Judge Simpson and that she did provide transcripts of that false evidence,
purportedly given by two police officers, out of a crimonal trial and I decline, at this time, to
name them.?

I appreciate the support from some here who've been  honest enough to respond  in a
positive manner whether openly, using their true identity, or understandably, aliases.
Back to page 1: Lies.